_______________The Other 90% of Science_______________
|
View Linked Comments |
PMID: 20117878 |
|
Jentzmik F et al Eur Urol 2010 Jul;58(1):12-8; discussio Sarcosine in urine after digital rectal examination fails as a marker in pr... |
|
| Only 1 comment exists on this article. |
|
Analytic methods questioned |
Rank: 1 |
| BioMed Crit Comm 2011; 4:2307 | |
| Posted: Feb 8, 2011 CCID: 2307 | |
| Commentator: Rao | Ave. score of this commentator: 2.5 for 2 scored comments. |
|
A letter to the editor from Hewavitharana (PMID: 20696519) listed a number of deficiencies in the reporting of the sarcosine studies. The report of Jentzmik et al was criticized for not having "used a validated analytical method to measure sarcosine in urine" and more detailed omissions in the procedure and in the reporting. |
|
Key authors in this publication: |
| Jentzmik F, Jung K, Kristiansen G, Lein M, Miller K, Stephan C. |
©2007-2013 BioMed Critical Commentary. All rights reserved.